Tahlia von den Edelkatzchen

prefix von den Edelkatzchen · British Shorthair · line: Roddifer · no blue eye. Carrier status not known · Variant known, this cat untested

How this cat is connected to the trait

1. Tahlia von den Edelkatzchen, n 09
2. Bansetigers Pizza Perlanera, n 09 61, the dam of Tahlia von den Edelkatzchen
3. Alladin Black Star, n 63, the sire of Bansetigers Pizza Perlanera
4. Roddiffer Azazello, BSH ns 25 63, the sire of Alladin Black Star. a founder of this survey; no variant has ever been identified in this line

That is 3 recorded parent links, and the animal at the end of it has never been tested, so the connection is a descent and not a result. Every step is a parent recorded in this register from a document; none of them is an assumption. The full genealogy is drawn below, and the sources for each animal are on its own page.

Save this cat as a PDF the connection, the genealogy and the source on one A4 landscape sheet, carrying this directory's name and address

What the pedigree implies

POSSIBLE CARRIER BY DESCENT. DBE-ALT, through Alladin Black Star, Amelia Nanotigr, Bansetigers Pizza Perlanera; the Nanotigr line, no variant identified, through Alladin Black Star, Amelia Nanotigr, Andersen Imperiya Serebra; the Roddifer line, no variant identified, through Bansetigers Pizza Perlanera, Roddiffer Azazello

This is computed from the recorded parentage each time this site is built and is not typed into the register. It is a deduction from the trait being dominant, not a statement by any source, and it is not the same thing as the record's own status field. Only a laboratory settles it for an individual. The full list is on latent lines.

What is flagged on this tree

1. GUDVANGENS NIKKI. THE BREEDER CHART WROTE THIS CODE AS 'b 25 03', with no breed prefix and its components out of order. The PawPeds pedigree for CH Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee gives the same components as BSH b 03 25. THE COMPONENTS AGREE, so the code is recorded in its well-formed order and the chart's own form is kept here. THIS IS A TRANSCRIPTION REPAIR AND NOT A CHANGE OF READING. His eye reading is unchanged and stays not-blue, which is the chart's, the chart having been drawn to record eye colour where the pedigree records none. S_FOLD_150
2. AMELIA NANOTIGR. THREE CATS CODED 63 ON COATS WITH NO WHITE SYMBOL AT ALL, IN THE NANOTIGR AND RODDIFER MATERIAL. BRAVA KOTOMODDA, BSH o 63, CINNAMON. RODDIFFER AZAZELLO, BSH ns 25 63, BLACK SILVER TICKED TABBY. AMELIA NANOTIGR, BSH ns 11 63, BLACK SILVER SHADED. 25 IS A TICKED TABBY AND 11 IS SHADED, AND NEITHER IS A WHITE CODE | UNDER THIS REGISTER'S COAT RULE ALL THREE SIT IN THE SOLID TIER. No white reaches either orbit on any of them, so NOTHING IN THEIR COATS CAN ACCOUNT FOR AN ODD EYE, and the 63 on each stands on its own | AND THE ARGUMENT THIS REGISTER HAS ALREADY MADE ABOUT 61 APPLIES TO 63 IN THE SAME WORDS. It holds that a 61 on a coat without white is A CANDIDATE 68, because a cattery has been shown writing 61 for animals it states carry a named dominant variant, and because one cat is coded 61 on his cattery's website and 68 on his registry pedigree. 63 IS THE ORDINARY ODD-EYE CODE AND 69 IS THE DOMINANT ONE, and the same reasoning makes these three CANDIDATE 69s | THE LINE IS WHY IT MATTERS. Amelia Nanotigr carries the NANOTIGR prefix and Roddiffer Azazello the RODDIFER, and both bodies of material sit under DBE^ALT in this register. THREE SOLID-COATED ODD-EYED ANIMALS IN A ROW IN THE ALT LINE IS NOT WHAT AN ORDINARY ODD EYE LOOKS LIKE. NO TEST HAS BEEN RUN ON ANY OF THEM
3. RODDIFFER AZAZELLO. THREE CATS CODED 63 ON COATS WITH NO WHITE SYMBOL AT ALL, IN THE NANOTIGR AND RODDIFER MATERIAL. BRAVA KOTOMODDA, BSH o 63, CINNAMON. RODDIFFER AZAZELLO, BSH ns 25 63, BLACK SILVER TICKED TABBY. AMELIA NANOTIGR, BSH ns 11 63, BLACK SILVER SHADED. 25 IS A TICKED TABBY AND 11 IS SHADED, AND NEITHER IS A WHITE CODE | UNDER THIS REGISTER'S COAT RULE ALL THREE SIT IN THE SOLID TIER. No white reaches either orbit on any of them, so NOTHING IN THEIR COATS CAN ACCOUNT FOR AN ODD EYE, and the 63 on each stands on its own | AND THE ARGUMENT THIS REGISTER HAS ALREADY MADE ABOUT 61 APPLIES TO 63 IN THE SAME WORDS. It holds that a 61 on a coat without white is A CANDIDATE 68, because a cattery has been shown writing 61 for animals it states carry a named dominant variant, and because one cat is coded 61 on his cattery's website and 68 on his registry pedigree. 63 IS THE ORDINARY ODD-EYE CODE AND 69 IS THE DOMINANT ONE, and the same reasoning makes these three CANDIDATE 69s | THE LINE IS WHY IT MATTERS. Amelia Nanotigr carries the NANOTIGR prefix and Roddiffer Azazello the RODDIFER, and both bodies of material sit under DBE^ALT in this register. THREE SOLID-COATED ODD-EYED ANIMALS IN A ROW IN THE ALT LINE IS NOT WHAT AN ORDINARY ODD EYE LOOKS LIKE. NO TEST HAS BEEN RUN ON ANY OF THEM

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id

edl-01

Sex

not stated by the source

Cattery prefix

von den Edelkatzchen

Breed, as stated

British Shorthair

Line

Roddifer

Eye status

not-blue: no blue eye. Carrier status not known

Certificate wording

black and white

Role

offspring

Relations named by the source

Bansetigers Blue Baloo x Bansetigers Pizza PerlaNera

Country

Germany

Year

born 12 February 2023

EMS code

n 09

The code read out

black; unspecified amount of white

The description held

microchip number withheld. Daughter of a 61-coded dam, carrying no eye code herself

Note

The code and the description do not use the same words for this coat. Both are recorded and neither is reconciled to the other.

Evidence grade

Reported asserted, with neither a test nor a traced descent

In the register

• Parents: Bansetigers Blue Baloo, Bansetigers Pizza Perlanera

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.