LITTER X-26, kittens not named by the source

British Shorthair · line: Igor · the source records no eye colour · Published line, tested against the known variants and carrying none · also in its ancestry: Azul (C15)

Genealogy trace, one printable page carrying the proposed code

How this cat is connected to the trait

1. LITTER X-26, kittens not named by the source
2. Felpatigatti Golden Zabava, written by the cattery a..., BRI cy 12 61 09, the dam of LITTER X-26, kittens not named by the source
3. Blue Diamond Heavenly IDT/ID, BRI b 12 09, the sire of Felpatigatti Golden Zabava, written by the cattery a...
4. Kittystar Leon, BRI ny 11 09 61, the sire of Blue Diamond Heavenly IDT/ID
5. Kittystar Gemm, BRI ny 25 09 61, the sire of Kittystar Leon
6. Kittystar Blue Sapphire, BRI n 24 03 60, the parent of Kittystar Gemm
7. BG*Amur Dream, BRI n 01 60, the parent of Kittystar Blue Sapphire
8. Igor, BSH n 02 61, the sire of BG*Amur Dream. a founder of this survey; no variant has ever been identified in this line

That is 7 recorded parent links, and the animal at the end of it has never been tested, so the connection is a descent and not a result. Every step is a parent recorded in this register from a document; none of them is an assumption. The full genealogy is drawn below, and the sources for each animal are on its own page.

Save this cat as a PDF the connection, the genealogy and the source on one A4 landscape sheet, carrying this directory's name and address

What the pedigree implies

POSSIBLE CARRIER BY DESCENT. the Azul (C15) line, no variant identified, through Kittystar Zara; the Igor line, no variant identified, through Abigal Golden Line, Amore Mio vom Grutholz, BG*Amur Dream

This is computed from the recorded parentage each time this site is built and is not typed into the register. It is a deduction from the trait being dominant, not a statement by any source, and it is not the same thing as the record's own status field. Only a laboratory settles it for an individual. The full list is on latent lines.

What is flagged on this tree

1. KITTYSTAR GEMM. LINE RECONCILED 31 AUGUST 2026, FROM 'Azul and Igor (C15)' TO 'Igor'. The old value was a chart name that put two founders in one string, so descent could not be measured against either. THIS CAT'S PARENTAGE REACHES IGOR AND THE REGISTER CAN SHOW IT. Nothing about the animal changed; the label stopped hiding what was already recorded. S_LINE_RECON
2. KITTYSTAR GEMM. Eye and coat, A DETERMINATION AND NOT A QUERY. This cat is blue-eyed in both eyes, carries a bicolour or locket white code, is not dominant white and is not colourpointed. THE CLASSIC WHITE SPOTTING GENE COVERS AN EYE WHERE THE WHITE HAPPENS TO FALL, WHICH GIVES AN ODD EYE AND NOT TWO BLUE ONES, so the coat does not account for this and a dominant blue eye is present in the line. IT IS NOT THE KIT ODD-EYE CASE. Its registry has entered no dominant eye code on it. WHICH VARIANT IS NOT DEDUCIBLE FROM A COAT CODE and none is adopted.
3. KITTYSTAR ZARA. LINE RECONCILED 31 AUGUST 2026, FROM 'Azul and Igor (C15)' TO 'Azul (C15)'. The old value named two founders at once. THIS CAT IS DRAWN ON THE C15 AZUL CHART AND HAS NO TRACED DESCENT TO IGOR OR TO ANY OTHER FOUNDER, so it is filed to the Azul material and to nothing further. THAT IS A WEAKER STATEMENT THAN THE OLD LABEL MADE, and it is the one the evidence supports. S_LINE_RECON
4. KITTYSTAR LEON. LINE RECONCILED 31 AUGUST 2026, FROM 'Azul and Igor (C15)' TO 'Igor'. The old value was a chart name that put two founders in one string, so descent could not be measured against either. THIS CAT'S PARENTAGE REACHES IGOR AND THE REGISTER CAN SHOW IT. Nothing about the animal changed; the label stopped hiding what was already recorded. S_LINE_RECON
5. KITTYSTAR LEON. Eye and coat, A DETERMINATION AND NOT A QUERY. This cat is blue-eyed in both eyes, carries a bicolour or locket white code, is not dominant white and is not colourpointed. THE CLASSIC WHITE SPOTTING GENE COVERS AN EYE WHERE THE WHITE HAPPENS TO FALL, WHICH GIVES AN ODD EYE AND NOT TWO BLUE ONES, so the coat does not account for this and a dominant blue eye is present in the line. IT IS NOT THE KIT ODD-EYE CASE. Its registry has entered no dominant eye code on it. WHICH VARIANT IS NOT DEDUCIBLE FROM A COAT CODE and none is adopted.
6. FELPATIGATTI GOLDEN ZABAVA, WRITTEN BY THE CATTERY AS ZABAVA FELPATI GATTI. DESCENT FROM IGOR, ON A STAMPED REGISTRY PEDIGREE RATHER THAN A CHART. Seven steps: Zabava, Blue Diamond Heavenly, Kittystar Leon, Kittystar Gemm, Kittystar Blue Sapphire, BG*Amur Dream, Igor. THE LINK THAT MAKES IT TRACEABLE IS SUPPLIED BY THIS SHEET: the register held Kittystar Gemm with a sire and no dam, and this sheet gives his dam as Kittystar Blue Sapphire, who was already held with BG*Amur Dream as her sire. WHAT THAT DOES NOT SETTLE IS THE CAUSE OF HER OWN BLUE EYE, because the 09 white stands on her code and on three generations above her. DESCENT FROM A LINE IS NOT A GENOTYPE AND IS NOT A CAUSE. S_TICA_ZABAVA
7. FELPATIGATTI GOLDEN ZABAVA, WRITTEN BY THE CATTERY AS ZABAVA FELPATI GATTI. Eye and coat, A DETERMINATION AND NOT A QUERY. This cat is blue-eyed in both eyes, carries a bicolour or locket white code, is not dominant white and is not colourpointed. THE CLASSIC WHITE SPOTTING GENE COVERS AN EYE WHERE THE WHITE HAPPENS TO FALL, WHICH GIVES AN ODD EYE AND NOT TWO BLUE ONES, so the coat does not account for this and a dominant blue eye is present in the line. IT IS NOT THE KIT ODD-EYE CASE. Its registry has entered no dominant eye code on it. WHICH VARIANT IS NOT DEDUCIBLE FROM A COAT CODE and none is adopted.

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id

fpg-05

Sex

not stated by the source

Position label

LITTER X-26, kittens not named by the source

Breed, as stated

British Shorthair

Line

Igor

Eye status

unknown: the source records no eye colour

Role

offspring

Relations named by the source

out of Felpatigatti Golden Zabava by Marwan MagicLand's

Year

born 6 June 2026

The description held

NO KITTEN IS NAMED, CODED OR SHOWN INDIVIDUALLY. The card announces the litter, names the two parents and gives their codes, and that is all it carries. NO LITTER KEY IS SET, because a litter key groups named littermates and none is named. THE LITTER IS RECORDED BECAUSE THE MATING IS: a queen coded 61 with 09 white, put to a male with no eye code, in June 2026. WHAT THE KITTENS ARE IS NOT KNOWN AND IS NOT GUESSED AT HERE

Evidence grade

Reported asserted, with neither a test nor a traced descent

In the register

• Parents: Marwan MagicLand's, Felpatigatti Golden Zabava, written by the cattery as Zabava Felpati Gatti

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.