a black odd-eyed cat of the Winnie Cat House, not named in the source

prefix Winnie Cat House · Chinese domestic cat · one blue eye, no cause established · No variant and no line attributed

Genealogy trace, one printable page carrying the proposed code

Under the variant field this directory proposes, this cat would read DBE clear. Tested negative on the panel recorded, with no unidentified line above. The proposal is set out in full here, and no registry issues this field today: it is computed from the record at each build and is not part of any registration.

How this cat is connected to the trait

No recorded parent link joins this cat to a founder or to a tested animal. What the record rests on instead is no recorded parent at all, which is a gap in the sources and not a statement that the cat had none.

No parent is recorded for this cat in the register, so no genealogy can be drawn. That is a gap in the sources, not a statement that the cat had none. Any offspring the register holds are listed below.

What the prefix suggests

DBE-xHW, on a prefix match only. No pedigree is held for this cat and no variant is adopted for it. Other cats of the Winnie Cat House prefix in this register carry DBE-xHW, on evidence graded reported at best. That is a prefix match and not an attribution: a prefix names a cattery, and a cattery can hold more than one population. It is recorded so that this cat appears on a list worth testing, and only a laboratory or a pedigree takes it off.

What is flagged

1. A black odd-eyed cat of the Winnie cat house, not named in the source. An odd-eyed black cat that returned nothing, and that is the whole point of holding it. A cat with a plain dominant blue eye presentation, no white to explain it, and no known variant detected. Two readings are open and this register closes neither. Either the cat carries a variant the panel run did not cover, which is the ordinary outcome the whole of this survey warns about, or it carries something not yet identified. DBE-xHW is the live candidate for the first reading, because no laboratory anywhere sells a test for it, so a cat carrying it CANNOT return positive on any panel on the market and will read as clear. The status is held as blue, variant unidentified, and the grade is wild-type, which means clear for the panel named and nothing more. That distinction is the one this survey asks every registry to write into its rules, and this cat is what it looks like in practice. S_PETGENO_278

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id

wnh-01

Sex

not stated by the source

Cattery prefix

Winnie Cat House

Breed, as stated

Chinese domestic cat

Eye status

odd-unattributed: one blue eye, no cause established

Eyes, in the source's words

odd

Country

China

Photograph credit

Photograph: Hao, PetGeno, China

The description held

Black, one amber eye and one blue eye, read from the photograph 13 September 2026. No white anywhere on the animal. The holder of this register states that no known variant was detected in this cat, and that it is not confirmed whether the cat is DBE-cDc or DBE-xHW. Both statements are held as given

Evidence grade

Wild type tested for the known variants and carried none

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.