Inamorana

British Longhair · line: Igor · both eyes blue · Published line, tested against the known variants and carrying none

Under the variant field this directory proposes, this cat would read DBE 161 x1p. A carrier of a variant nobody has sequenced, on a line this proposal gives a suffix to. The proposal is set out in full here, and no registry issues this field today: it is computed from the record at each build and is not part of any registration.

How this cat is connected to the trait

NO RECORDED PARENT LINK JOINS THIS CAT TO A FOUNDER OR TO A TESTED ANIMAL. What the record rests on instead is the line recorded on it, Igor, which is a source's attribution and not a descent this register can walk; and no recorded parent at all, which is a gap in the sources and not a statement that the cat had none.

No parent is recorded for this cat in the register, so no genealogy can be drawn. That is a gap in the sources, not a statement that the cat had none. Any offspring the register holds are listed below.

What is flagged

1. INAMORANA. Attribution by the line's own cattery. THE LANA'S STORY CATTERY STATES THAT ITS DOMINANT BLUE EYE BRITISH SHORTHAIR LINE COMES FROM THE IGOR GENE, relayed to this survey 18 August 2026. That is the breeder of the line speaking about the line, which is a stronger source than a chart drawn by a third party, AND IT IS STILL NOT A GENOTYPE AND NOT A REGISTRY RECORD. THE DESCENT IT ASSERTS RUNS THROUGH KITTYSTAR BRILLIANT: genealogy C12b draws these cats out of Kittystar Brilliant by Ualika Renesmee, Brilliant as F2 DBE out of Amur Dream, and Amur Dream as F1 DBE out of Igor. THE PAWPEDS SHEETS DO NOT RECORD THAT LAST STEP: they give BG'Amur Dream with all four ancestor positions empty and Igor nowhere on the page. The cattery's statement and the chart agree with each other and the registry is silent, and the survey does not settle it by preferring the two that agree
2. INAMORANA. Eye and coat, THE STRONGEST EXCLUSION THIS REGISTER CAN MAKE FROM A CODE. This cat is blue-eyed in both eyes and its recorded coat carries NO WHITE SPOTTING CODE AT ALL, is not dominant white and is not colourpointed. NOTHING IN THE COAT CAN PALE AN IRIS. A dominant blue eye is present and it is not the KIT odd-eye case and not the white-cat case. Its registry has entered no dominant eye code on it. WHICH VARIANT IS NOT DEDUCIBLE FROM A COAT CODE and none is adopted: a genotype or a trace to a named founder would name it.

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id

igs-10

Sex

not stated by the source

Breed, as stated

British Longhair

Line

Igor

Eye status

blue: both eyes blue

Eyes, in the source's words

blue

Relations named by the source

out of Kittystar Brilliant

EMS code

BLH ns 11 61

The code read out

British Longhair; black silver; shaded; blue eyes

The description held

genotype notation on the chart: DBE, n/cop, A/a, and white not found. The white spotting alleles were tested for and none was found, so the blue eye is not attributable to that route BREED CORRECTED 28 AUGUST 2026: the record read British Shorthair while its own EMS code reads BLH, which is British Longhair. The code is the source's, the breed field was this register's, so the field is brought into line with the code. S_BREED_161

Note

The code and the description do not use the same words for this coat. Both are recorded and neither is reconciled to the other.

Evidence grade

Line-traced descent from a named founder is stated by the source

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.