Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee

prefix Wabisabi · British Shorthair · line: Nanotigr · the source records no eye colour · Variant known, this cat untested · also in its ancestry: DBE-NAD

Genealogy trace, one printable page carrying the proposed code

How this cat is connected to the trait

1. Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee, BSH q
2. Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda, BSH q, the dam of Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee
3. Brava Kotomodda, BSH o 63, the dam of Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda
4. Roddiffer Azazello, BSH ns 25 63, the sire of Brava Kotomodda. a founder of this survey; no variant has ever been identified in this line

That is 3 recorded parent links, and the animal at the end of it has never been tested, so the connection is a descent and not a result. Every step is a parent recorded in this register from a document; none of them is an assumption. The full genealogy is drawn below, and the sources for each animal are on its own page.

Save this cat as a PDF the connection, the genealogy and the source on one A4 landscape sheet, carrying this directory's name and address

What the pedigree implies

Possible carrier by descent. DBE-ALT, through Amelia Nanotigr, Brava Kotomodda, Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda; the Nadeya line, DBE-NAD, though no traced descent from the genotyped founder reaches this cat, through EC Asterix of Sarsen Stones, EC Quandili Quicks De Tuatha De Danann, GIC Silver-Gary V Quintana; the Nanotigr line, no variant identified, through Amelia Nanotigr, Andersen Imperiya Serebra, Baierbach Baerchen's Lillyfee, printed as Bärchen's; the Nanotigr (Kotomodda and Cotomodda, one cattery) line, no variant identified, through Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda; the Roddifer line, no variant identified, through Hellboy of Richland Hill, La Fee von den Bunten Trollen, Roddiffer Azazello

This is computed from the recorded parentage each time this site is built and is not typed into the register. It is a deduction from the trait being dominant, not a statement by any source, and it is not the same thing as the record's own status field. Only a laboratory settles it for an individual. The full list is on latent lines.

What is flagged on this tree

1. Gudvangens Nikki. The breeder chart wrote this code as 'b 25 03', with no breed prefix and its components out of order. The PawPeds pedigree for CH Wabisabi's My Mona-Lee gives the same components as BSH b 03 25. The components agree, so the code is recorded in its well-formed order and the chart's own form is kept here. This is a transcription repair and not a change of reading. His eye reading is unchanged and stays not-blue, which is the chart's, the chart having been drawn to record eye colour where the pedigree records none. S_FOLD_150
2. Amelia Nanotigr. Three cats coded 63 on coats with no white symbol at all, in the Nanotigr and Roddifer material. Brava Kotomodda, BSH o 63, CINNAMON. Roddiffer Azazello, BSH ns 25 63, black silver ticked tabby. Amelia Nanotigr, BSH ns 11 63, black silver shaded. 25 is a ticked tabby and 11 is shaded, and neither is a white code | under this register's coat rule all three sit in the solid tier. No white reaches either orbit on any of them, so nothing in their coats can account for an odd eye, and the 63 on each stands on its own | and the argument this register has already made about 61 applies to 63 in the same words. It holds that a 61 on a coat without white is a candidate 68, because a cattery has been shown writing 61 for animals it states carry a named dominant variant, and because one cat is coded 61 on his cattery's website and 68 on his registry pedigree. 63 is the ordinary odd-eye code and 69 is the dominant one, and the same reasoning makes these three CANDIDATE 69s | the line is why it matters. Amelia Nanotigr carries the NANOTIGR prefix and Roddiffer Azazello the RODDIFER, and both bodies of material sit under DBE^ALT in this register. Three solid-coated odd-eyed animals in a row in the ALT line is not what an ordinary odd eye looks like. No test has been run on any of them
3. Kireineko's Precious. Line reconciled 31 AUGUST 2026, FROM 'Azul and Igor (C15)' TO 'Pedigree ancestry, not a DBE line'. This record was pulled in as an ancestor off a Pawpeds sheet: it carries no eye code of any kind and its status is unknown. Filing it to a DBE line counted an ordinary ancestor as part of the line, which inflates the line and says something about the animal that no source says. S_LINE_RECON
4. Roddiffer Azazello. Three cats coded 63 on coats with no white symbol at all, in the Nanotigr and Roddifer material. Brava Kotomodda, BSH o 63, CINNAMON. Roddiffer Azazello, BSH ns 25 63, black silver ticked tabby. Amelia Nanotigr, BSH ns 11 63, black silver shaded. 25 is a ticked tabby and 11 is shaded, and neither is a white code | under this register's coat rule all three sit in the solid tier. No white reaches either orbit on any of them, so nothing in their coats can account for an odd eye, and the 63 on each stands on its own | and the argument this register has already made about 61 applies to 63 in the same words. It holds that a 61 on a coat without white is a candidate 68, because a cattery has been shown writing 61 for animals it states carry a named dominant variant, and because one cat is coded 61 on his cattery's website and 68 on his registry pedigree. 63 is the ordinary odd-eye code and 69 is the dominant one, and the same reasoning makes these three CANDIDATE 69s | the line is why it matters. Amelia Nanotigr carries the NANOTIGR prefix and Roddiffer Azazello the RODDIFER, and both bodies of material sit under DBE^ALT in this register. Three solid-coated odd-eyed animals in a row in the ALT line is not what an ordinary odd eye looks like. No test has been run on any of them
5. Hesticus Urfin. Name. Two sources, two names, one position in the pedigree. This register held him as Hesticus Urfin Red. The PawPeds chart for Cotomodda Hubba-Bubba read 17 August 2026 gives Hesticus Urfin, BSH d, in the same place: sire of Cotomodda A'Effi Farrow. The shorter name and the code are taken from the chart and the earlier form is recorded here
6. Brava Kotomodda. Three cats coded 63 on coats with no white symbol at all, in the Nanotigr and Roddifer material. Brava Kotomodda, BSH o 63, CINNAMON. Roddiffer Azazello, BSH ns 25 63, black silver ticked tabby. Amelia Nanotigr, BSH ns 11 63, black silver shaded. 25 is a ticked tabby and 11 is shaded, and neither is a white code | under this register's coat rule all three sit in the solid tier. No white reaches either orbit on any of them, so nothing in their coats can account for an odd eye, and the 63 on each stands on its own | and the argument this register has already made about 61 applies to 63 in the same words. It holds that a 61 on a coat without white is a candidate 68, because a cattery has been shown writing 61 for animals it states carry a named dominant variant, and because one cat is coded 61 on his cattery's website and 68 on his registry pedigree. 63 is the ordinary odd-eye code and 69 is the dominant one, and the same reasoning makes these three CANDIDATE 69s | the line is why it matters. Amelia Nanotigr carries the NANOTIGR prefix and Roddiffer Azazello the RODDIFER, and both bodies of material sit under DBE^ALT in this register. Three solid-coated odd-eyed animals in a row in the ALT line is not what an ordinary odd eye looks like. No test has been run on any of them
7. Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda. No eye code is carried on this animal by the registry that holds her. The Polish Feline Federation sheet gives BSH q and nothing further. She is held blue in this register on the breeder material that reached it first, and the registry entry does not confirm it
8. Wabisabi's my Mona-Lee. A parentage contradiction closed by a document, and a warning about the shortcut that would have closed it wrongly. This register held both recorded parents of this cat as the same sex, which cannot be right, and could not resolve it from anything it held | the parents field is ordered sire first on 977 records of 1,010, and it would have been easy to treat that as a rule. On the Wabisabi's my Mona-Lee sheet the sire is the animal held second. Had the convention been applied as a rule, Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda would have been written male, and she is a tortie, BSH q. A convention that holds 97 times in 100 is not a source, and this is the record that shows why | the order is now corrected to sire first wherever a document has named the sire

A flag is not an error. It marks a place where two sources say different things, or where an attribution cannot be made on the evidence held.

The record

Register id

nan-33

Sex

female

Cattery prefix

Wabisabi

Breed, as stated

British Shorthair

Line

Nanotigr

Eye status

unknown: the source records no eye colour

Role

other

Relations named by the source

Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda x Heaven Renesmee

EMS code

BSH q

The code read out

British Shorthair; cinnamon tortie

Evidence grade

Reported asserted, with neither a test nor a traced descent

In the register

• Parents: Heaven Renesmee, Fancy Skyblue Kotomodda

This directory is a working aid compiled from published charts, registry documents and breeder statements. It is not a register and it has no standing of any kind. The grade attaches to the animal, not to the line: a cat whose ancestor was genotyped is line-traced, not genotyped.